Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 08:49
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
401(k) Stats Suggest Americans Still Confident - Newser
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Vandals slash tires on dozens of vehicles in West Michigan - MLive.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Former Player Gives Definitive Verdict on Knicks Firing Tom Thibodeau - Athlon Sports
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Liam Coen: I think Trevor Lawrence’s footwork has drastically improved - NBC Sports
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Is the Las Vegas Grand Prix considered one of the "premier events on the Formula 1 calendar?"
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What celebrity do you admire the most?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Aaron Wiggins Is The Key To Understanding OKC’s Revolutionary Depth - Defector
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.